9 dicembre forconi: 05/20/18

domenica 20 maggio 2018

Turkish Gold Imports Triple As The Central Bank Diversifies Out Of Dollars

Turkish gold imports surged due to a sharp increase in investment demand as well as renewed central bank purchases. While the Chinese and Russian governments have been adding gold to their official reserves over the past several years, Turkey added 86 metric tons to its official holdings in the last seven months of 2017.
According to the 2018 World Gold Survey, Turkish official gold holdings reached a new record high of 565 metric tons (mt) last year as the government decided to replace a significant amount of its dollar reserves with gold. And this continued even in the first quarter of 2018. Information from the World Gold Council's Demand Trend reported that Turkey added another 30 mt of gold to its official reserves in Q1 2018.
If we look at the chart below, we can see just how much gold Turkey imported in 2017 versus 2016:
Turkish gold imports more than tripled from 106 mt in 2016 to 361 mt in 2017. Again, the large increase in Turkish gold imports was due to a 60% increase in investment demand and the 86 mt purchase by the central bank. With the addition of the 30 mt of central bank gold purchases in Q1 2018, official Turkish holdings are now nearly 600 mt.
Of the total 366 mt of central bank gold purchases in 2017, Russia (224 mt) accounted for 61% of the amount, while Turkey (86 mt) acquired 23% and Kazakhstan (43 mt) was at 12%. The remaining 4% was split amongst Columbia, Mongolia, Indonesia, Jordan and Thailand (Source: GFMS 2108 World Gold Survey).
What is quite interesting about the increase in Turkish gold demand and imports is how it compares to the United States. In 2017, Turkey imported 361 mt of gold versus 255 mt for the United States. Thus, Turkey, whose population is one-quarter of the United States, imported 100+ mt more gold. Of course, most of the U.S. gold imports are refined and then exported to Switzerland, United Kingdom, China and various other Asian and Middle Eastern countries.
Furthermore, as U.S. gold investment plunged by 55% in 2017, Turkish demand for gold bullion surged by 60%, mainly due to an increase in official coin purchases. According to the 2018 World Gold Survey, Turkish official coin sales jumped to 38 mt versus 22 mt in 2016. Thus, the Turkish population consumed more than three times the 13 mt of U.S. official gold coin sales last year.
Now, if we look a the major foreign holders of U.S. Treasury securities, Turkey has been liquidating its dollar holdings by $16 billion since its peak in October 2017:
You will also notice that Russia has also been liquidating U.S. Treasuries by approximately $11 billion since its peak in November 2017. However, Russia wasn't selling U.S. treasuries to purchase gold; rather they were diversifying out of dollars and into IMF bonds. (Source: Russia says it will sell some U.S. Treasuries, buy IMF bonds) As Russia sells U.S. Treasuries to purchase IMF bonds, it also added another 42 mt of gold to its reserves in Q1 2018.
While there are countless reasons why Russia is adding gold to its official holdings, the most important reason is quite simply, because it can. The majority of countries are running massive trade and balance account deficits and cannot purchase gold. Russia is one of the few countries that export a great deal more oil than it uses domestically, which is part of the reason it enjoyed a $115 billion trade surplus last year. (Source: Russia: Trade Balance - Statista)
Yes, the U.S. government could print money to purchase gold, but it's not quite that simple. First, there are no western central banks buying gold. They just can't. Most of what the central banks sold into the market has come from the IMF and western central banks. Second, for a western central bank to start purchasing gold, it would be seen as a huge red flag to western fiat currencies.
Lastly, gold is a barometer for the U.S. dollar. If the U.S. government started printing money to buy gold, just think about how that would not only impact the price but also market sentiment. Western central banks will continue to liquidate gold until the financial markets and the fiat monetary system disintegrate.
When we start to see more countries like Turkey adding to their gold reserves, it's a clear sign that all is not well in the global financial markets.
Fonte: qui

Il petrolio sfiora quota $80: adesso è troppo caro, frenerà i consumi

Il prezzo del petrolio minaccia quota $80 suscitando le perplessità dell’Aie. Per gli esperti il greggio è ora troppo caro.

Il petrolio sfiora quota $80: adesso è troppo caro, frenerà i consumi
Il prezzo del petrolio si è minacciosamente riavvicinato alla soglia degli $80, il tutto in concomitanza con la pubblicazione dell’ultimo interessante report dell’Aie.
Gli esperti hanno fatto notare come da giugno dello scorso anno ad oggi la quotazione del greggio abbia guadagnato più di 75 punti percentualie sia ora giunta su livelli giudicati eccessivamente elevati per continuare a sostenere la domanda.
Per dirla in altre parole, secondo l’Aie il prezzo del petrolio è ormai troppo caro e l’aumento della quotazione (sia quella del Brent che quella del Wti) avrà un impatto non indifferente sui consumi che finiranno, inevitabilmente, per contrarsi.

(Il prezzo del petrolio Wti da giugno 2017 ad oggi)

Cosa sostiene il petrolio oggi

Diversi elementi stanno continuando supportare il buon andamento del greggio. Tra questi come non annoverare le tensioni internazionali che, qualche giorno fa, hanno imposto a Donald Trump di stracciare lo storico accordo nucleare con l’Iran mettendo così in pericolo le esportazioni dalla Repubblica islamica.
Non meno evidente sull’andamento del prezzo del petrolio è stato poi l’apporto del Venezuela, ancora nel bel mezzo di una crisi economica senza precedenti che ha imposto un taglio della produzione ai minimi storici (si ricordi che il Paese di Nicolas Maduro siede sulle più grandi riserve petrolifere al mondo e ha sempre fatto del greggio la sua più grande fonte di sostentamento, almeno fino allo scoppio della crisi).
“Monitoreremo da vicino gli sviluppi e se necessario siamo pronti ad agire per assicurare che i mercati rimangano ben riforniti”, ha commentato l’Aie con riferimento all’ipotesi di ricorrere alle scorte di emergenza in caso di estrema carenza dell’offerta.

Occhio all’eccessiva riduzione dell’offerta

Quel che emerge dal report dell’Aie è la preoccupazione degli esperti nei confronti del futuro andamento dell’offerta. Negli ultimi anni il mercato ha assistito inerme ad un eccesso di greggio che ha spinto sempre più in basso il prezzo del petrolio. Da qui gli innumerevoli sforzi dei Paesi produttori che, soprattutto con lo storico accordo OPEC di Vienna, hanno tentato di riequilibrare la situazione.
tagli alla produzione hanno avuto l’effetto sperato e il surplus di petrolio sul mercato si è ridotto finché, però, la situazione non ha iniziato quasi a capovolgersi. L’Aie crede che i maggiori rischi riguardino oggi proprio l’offerta che, a causa di situazioni calde come quelle in Iran e Venezuela, potrebbe continuare a scemare.

Adesso il petrolio è troppo caro?

Uno squilibrio del mercato a favore della domanda avrebbe un effetto ancor più evidente sul prezzo del petrolio che potrebbe continuare ad aumentare (qualcuno ha addirittura previsto il prossimo raggiungimento di quota $100, anche se la soglia più probabile al momento appare quota $80).
“Sarebbe straordinario se un balzo tanto grande non influenzasse la crescita della domanda, soprattutto dopo che, negli ultimi anni, diversi Paesi emergenti hanno ridimensionato o eliminato del tutto i sussidi rivolti ai consumatori finali”.
Eppure, secondo l’Aie, un prezzo del petrolio troppo elevato andrà inevitabilmente ad intaccare i consumi e, di conseguenza, la domanda.
Questo, ricordano gli esperti, potrebbe non bastare a frenare la corsa del greggio che continuerà ad essere sostenuto dal persistente calo della domanda.
Al momento della scrittura la quotazione del Brent e quella del Wti stanno risentendo particolarmente degli ultimi dati sulle scorte di greggio USA, scese ancora una volta di 1,4 milioni di barili su quota 432,34 milioni di barili, nella settimana terminata l’11 maggio,
Il prezzo del petrolio texano sta scambiando in rialzo dello 0,39% su quota $71,77, mentre quello del Mare del Nord sta avanzando di un più modesto 0,20% su quota $79.45
Fonte: qui

It's Not China That's Liquidating US Treasuries

Recent fears, warranted or not about the potential for retaliatory liquidation by China of its US Treasury holdings appear to have been once again vastly exaggerated because according to the latest TIC data released, America's trade-war nemesis added $11 billion in TSYs in March, bringing its total to a 5 month high, following the addition of $8.5 billion in March, and nearly $100 billion higher over the past year.
But while China is still buying - for now, given the lagged data - one other notable nation is selling... significantly.
The second largest foreign US creditor, Japan, has been liquidating aggressively in recent months and in March, Japan sold $16 billion in TSYs (the most of any nation in March), bringing its total to just $1,043.5BN, the lowest total in 7 years, since Oct 2011.
And while last month we already knew that Japan was dumping US paper, a new seller emerged this month: hedge funds, i.e. the so-called "Cayman Island" entity, which in March sold just shy of $10 billion in Treasurys.
Meanwhile, and perhaps most unexpected, at a time when US-Russia relations are the worst they have been in decades, Russia actually added $2.3BN in US paper.
All this Treasury buying (and selling) was during the chaotic swings of the March among concerns that China would stop buying or even buy US paper: recall TIC data is 2 months delayed. But April will likely be the big tell as that was during the peak of the escalating trade war tensions, when Trump and Xi were going at it head to head.
Furthermore, as we showed over the weekend, the far more recent Fed Custody holdings data released by the Fed last week showed that the selling by foreign central banks started in earnest in March and continued well into May, so expect next month's data to be especially turbulent.
Meanwhile, the good news for all these buyers of US debt is that thanks to Trump's budget, there's plenty more where that came from.
Looking at the broader universe of all US International capital transactions, in March, foreign public and private entities sold a total of $4.9BN in Treasurys while buying $25.2N in Agencies; they also added a modest $22.4 BN in corporate bonds. 
But the biggest surprise - or perhaps not considering what happened to stocks in March - is that after buying a near-record $62.5BN in January and another $57.9BN in US equities in February, in March, foreigners hit the brakes on further US stock purchases, and actually sold a whopping $24.2BN in stocks, the biggest monthly sale going back to September 2015. Fonte: qui 

Subprime Chaos: The Auto Bubble's Bursting And The Data Is Worse Than 2008

Last week, used car prices had their biggest drop since 2009 – directly after the financial market meltdown of 2008.
Right now, the auto market is showing signs of incredible worry.
Delinquent subprime auto-loans are higher than they were in the last recession.
Look for yourself...
What’s interesting – and worrisome – is that consumers are defaulting on subprime auto loans when the economy is reportedly doing ‘very well’.
Like I wrote last week – there are cracks under the economy’s foundation. And it’s like a bucket of cold water in the face of the mainstream financial media that’s pushing the ‘growth’ story.
We must ask ourselves – “if things are going so well, why are subprime loan delinquencies at a 22-year high?”
I can’t help but feel a bit nostalgic. This was the same situation that led up to the 2008 housing crisis. . .
First, there was massive growth in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage debt. Then, the Federal Reserve – led by Alan Greenspan – began aggressively raising rates after years of low rates. Soon after, subprime loans started blowing up – which trickled into the prime loans. And eventually, everything was in chaos.
Using the often-ignored Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) – coined by the little-known but brilliant economist Ludwig Von Mises – I am blaming the Fed for all this.
Thanks to the Fed, a near decade of zero-interest rate policies (ZIRP) and three rounds of Quantitative Easing (which totaled over $3.8 trillion in printed money) – the consumers became hooked on cheap auto loans. . .
They then began tightening credit – crippling the borrowers.
Think of it this way – imagine you’re addicted to alcohol. And your bartender keeps giving you cheap drinks each night for months. Eventually, from drinking way more than you should’ve been able to afford, you now have a very high tolerance.
But suddenly – the bartender becomes strict and starts giving you less booze. He tells you, “sorry but no more free alcohol for you.” Problem is, you wouldn’t have drank so much if you had to pay full price for it.
Now you’re left with awful withdrawals – scrounging together all the extra money you can just to pay for a drink. But the only way you can really afford to feel better is if he starts giving out free drinks again or you painfully detox.
Just look at the collapse in auto-loan growth since 2015 – when the Fed began tightening with their end of QE and talk of rate hikes...
Clearly the higher rates had an impact on new auto loans.
But a bigger – and more pressing – problem is that the Fed’s short-term interest rate hikes are making these current subprime auto loans unserviceable. The borrowers are having a harder time paying more interest for an asset that depreciates 15% the moment they take it off the lot.
Clearly, affordability is becoming a problem. . .
As I learned from Ludwig Von Mises and the other brilliant Austrian economists – the Fed created a bubble in auto-loans by keeping rates low and printing trillions. And now they’re going to blow the whole thing up with their rate hikes.
Just like taking the free drinks away. . .
I expect delinquent subprime loans to keep hitting new highs. And I expect the ‘growth’ story the pundits keep pushing down our throats will fade.
Because even if the auto-loan industry and general economy hasn’t rolled over yet, each new Fed rate hike pushes us one step closer to the edge.
0.25% at a time. . .
So, with our Macro-Fragility Index (MFI) alarmingly high in the auto sector – I’m going to spend time looking for opportunities here.
History shows us that when things start their descent into collapse – the subprime market is the first to get hit.
Food for thought. . .

"What Is The Magic Number?": Wall Street Answers The Most Important Question For Investors Today

In its latest Fund Manager Survey, Bank of America asked what may be the most important questions for investors today: "What level of US 10y Treasury yields would cause you to rotate from equities into bonds?"

That level, which Bank of America's Michael Hartnett has repeatedly dubbed the "magic number", rose from 3.5% last month to 3.6% in the May survey, and represents that weighted mid-point of the responses by the 223 survey participants, who manage a total of $643BN .
As a reminder, last week Hartnett explained why he agrees with the FMS response, saying "it should not be a surprise if reallocation starts before yields get to 3.5%. Indeed, as we breached 3% the following asset classes all suggested that the 3-3.5% range would become “painful” if not accompanied by much stronger economic data."  As the BofA CIO further added, banks, homebuilding stocks, US dollar, EM, yield curve all suggested 3% on the 10-year Treasury yield was the "magic number."
  • Lower US bank stocks: rise in rates was shifting from a “good” rise to a “bad” rise (financials underperformed utilities by 1250bps since mid-March)
  • Lower US homebuilding stocks: a good lead indicator of interest rates, homebuilding stocks are saying the Fed is making a “policy mistake”
Then, yesterday, as 10Y yields broke out to fresh post-Taper Tantrum highs, rising above 3.05% and as high as 3.09%, a level not seen since 2011, Bill Gross tweeted that "the Economy can't support yields higher than 3.25% for 30s and 10s, nor 3% for 5s. Continuing hibernating bond bear market is best forecast."
And, as we also showed yesterday, demonstrating the recent sharp drop in loan demand across the board as a result of higher rates despite far easier lending conditions, and affecting everything from C&I loans...
... to residential mortgages...
... to consumer loans...
... Gross is right, only the Fed hasn't quite realized yet that US interest rates are now at a level that leads to not only lack of loan growth, but outright deleveraging, loan destruction and thus, deflation.

To underscore his point, Gross also noted the technicals and said that "30yr Tsy long-term downward yield trendline for the past 3 decades now at  3.22%, only ~4bps higher than today's yield." Asking rhetorically, "will 3.22% be broken to upside?" his answer was no.
Then, overnight, another bond titan - and Gross' former employer - Pimco also agreed with the "magic number" consensus, when its co-head of Asia-Pacific, Robert Mead, said that 10Y yields will move in a 3% to 3.5% range for the rest of the year as the Federal Reserve continues raising interest rates.
Addressing the second longest US economic expansion, and second oldest business cycle in US history...
... Mead stated the obvious to the Bloomberg Invest summit in Sydney: "we do think this hiking cycle is quite well advanced." adding that while "the backdrop of the U.S. economy has been pretty strong and going for a long time. At some point we will find these high yields will become an impediment for growth.”
As the charts showing negative loan demand above suggest, that point is now.
Mead then said that the higher rates rise, the more the record short overhang will, or at least should, be unwound: “Nothing is pound-the-table cheap,” but rising yields mean investors can gradually reduce their underweight bond positions, Mead told the Bloomberg conference.
Confirming this observations, Mark Delaney - the chief investment officer of AustralianSuper Pty, the nation’s largest pension fund - said he was thinking about buying bonds again after selling almost all holdings last year.
"We sold almost all our bonds in 2017, but now they’re a percent higher - a percent plus, a bit higher - we’re starting to think about whether or not we should start closing those short positions," Delaney told the Australian summit.
It's not just positioning however, and the inevitable short squeeze: according to Jeffrey Johnson, head of Asia-Pacific fixed income at Vanguard Australia, inflation will remain anchored due to the global secular deflationary tailwinds: 
Powerful forces such as demographics, globalization and technology should keep a cap on yields, Johnson told the summit.
Putting that in numbers, Johnson said that the fair value for U.S. 10-year yields would be 3% to 3.25%. And as evidence, he added that Vanguard has seen evidence of investors getting back into fixed income to take advantage of the higher yields.
Ultimately, it will be up to the pension funds of the world, most of whom are significantly underinvested in fixed income having rushed into equities in recent years, to be the marginal buyer that pushes rates decidedly lower, especially if the Fed indeed plans to hike at least another 3 more times this year, in which case if Wall Street is right, it would be the Fed itself that inverts the yield curve.
But there's time before that happens. For immediate next steps, just keep an eye on the value of the US Dollar: should the recent torrid rally finally fizzle, that will be the time to go long bonds. Fonte: qui